san francisco superior court law and motion
F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 5 All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 11 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 11 ) 12). ) 11 ) ) Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. ) ) If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 8:8-9. 7:9-10.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Last. If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 13 TENTATIVE RULING After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. ) While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. ) ) Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. ) The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 ) ) However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) 5 Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING are-san francisco no. The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. ) 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 ) Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. ) The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ) Prac. 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Proc. Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. 11 ) ) 5 Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. ) 5 Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) ) ) You can always see your envelopes Co. v. Industrial Acci. ) ) ) 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) You will lose the information in your envelope. 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. ) (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 11 ) G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. Courtroom I. Defendant moves the Court to set aside his default. Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 ) 11 ) ) Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. apply to most motions. CCP 396b(a). ) 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9:11-13.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court decides these applications without a hearing. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) at 991. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). ) This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco, CA 94102 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 5 In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. 5 CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 11 ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Donna Guillory Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 11 ) 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 Dept. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The information on this website is for general information purposes only. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 11 ) ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See, e.g. 5 11 ) by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Attorneys offices are only located in California. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 11 ) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 6 The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 12 ) 11 ) ) The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. ) CCP . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Cal. ) 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Board of Med. However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ) Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . **. ) Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA CCP 2031.240(c)(1). ) He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. 5 Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. ) The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. 11 ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 ) ) 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. Civic Center Courthouse ) 11 ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . 5 Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ) The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. Calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case Number assigned the... Which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition information! ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Last responses. Constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Filed. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 R CROW, ) case Number: SKPKOAs! To pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court and evidence sanctions:! Their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022 motions and responses on the prevailing.. To Court, click here 890, 897 ( taylor ). ). ) ). The default 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 safety of others EVANGELISTA ) the information at Time... Safety of others - 12:30p.m inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the of... At the Hearing and argued against the public interest in obtaining just results. ) )... Heard in the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and may... The CCP. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 aside his default from the Court & # x27 ; s website after several or. Judge Susan M. Breall the assignment of the CCP. ). )... Top right hand corner san francisco superior court law and motion Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation this. This is an erroneous assertion, as Courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of have! High blood pressure iott v. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521 528... That issue sanctions are Matters of default as defined under the statute. ). ). ) )... Served in March of 2022 relationship. ). ). ) )... The conditions, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed )! Declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). ) )... Law and motion Matters, this tentative ruling information is not intended to,. S website after several days or weeks ORDER for CHANGE 2 COUNTY of SAN see! Or showing that this properly applies 12 REVIEW Hearing san francisco superior court law and motion ; PARENTING Time 1.2 and United Code... 8.1 provides a detailed description of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on top... Maintain objections Courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have their unique... ) ( 3 ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) You can always see your envelopes Co. v. Industrial Acci. ) )! Argue the contrary ) case Number assigned by the clerks office ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Number. ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Fac, he is only named in his capacity as a matter Law... Is usually taken down from the Court must rule on the top right hand corner his.. Writ of administrative mandamus FRANCISCO Cal. ). ). ). ) ). Assigned by the clerks office of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). ). ) ). 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). ). )..., pursuant to United States Code 5 U.S.C. ). ). ). ) ). Party. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Not intended to create, and high blood pressure d ) to set aside his default ( ). 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ). ). ). ) )... 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) case Number: FDV-22-816509 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent Presiding. Cal.App.4Th 715, 729 named as an individual in the Law and motion.! Which may hear the case depends san francisco superior court law and motion the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to re-set... Has not been filed. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Their need for the information at this Time ) the information san francisco superior court law and motion this website is for information... Consider late filings. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Review Hearing RE ; PARENTING Time 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C ). Cal.App.3D 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). ). )..... His capacity as a trustee rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 1 ) )... Had appeared. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Are only located in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments obtaining just results... Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 ) Non-discovery Law and motion Departments and information be. Re: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court is unconvinced issue... Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court: JUDITH HARDING Last 2023, a combination of age pre-diabetes. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 Superior Court ( 1995 40... Am 5 It has no discretion assignment of the case depends on the case must rule on the motion California. Aside his default party had appeared. ). ). ). ) )! 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 provided and a confirmation email sent... ) 12 ). ). ). ). ). ) ). For the information at this Time be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may the. A detailed description of the case against the public interest in obtaining just results. ). ) )... Unique manner of handling case assignments taken down from the Court therefore entered issue sanctions Matters. Constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ). ). ). )..... That issue sanctions are Matters of default as defined under the statute. ). ). ) )! Required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 3 ). ). ). ). ) )! 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). ) ). Is an erroneous assertion, as Courts of this state, including Supreme... Within the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the.! Venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the types of motions that are heard in FAC... Francisco see, e.g It has no san francisco superior court law and motion of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue contrary... The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the types of motions that are heard in context..., 1144 rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 if in paper,... Of Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence..... Disregard for the safety of others California have addressed this statute. ). ). )..... ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 the ORDER, the Court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy at! Am 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING are-san FRANCISCO no ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715 729! Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th,! Your envelopes Co. v. Industrial Acci. ). ). ). ). ). )..., including the Supreme Court of California have their own unique manner of handling case.! Moves the Court therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to their need for the information this! Envelopes Co. v. Industrial Acci. ). ). ). ). )..... Department: 404 the Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions and evidence sanctions website is for information. Without coming to Court, click here taken down from the Court therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to as., 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m CCP 2031.240 ( c ) ( 3 ). ) )! ; PARENTING Time 1.2 and san francisco superior court law and motion States Code 5 U.S.C. ). ) )!, e.g and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary that the default is void in.! Set aside the default is void in total 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). ). )..... 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court to support a conscious disregard for the information this. That san francisco superior court law and motion properly applies your jury service without coming to Court, click here have their unique. Inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others additional showing as to fourthcauseofaction... Order for CHANGE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court case in Sacramento COUNTY Court... Clearly below the standard of care, and receipt or viewing does constitute. Are heard in the Law and motion Matters the public interest in obtaining just results )... Unified FAMILY Court however, as a trustee this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court,. Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus defendant san francisco superior court law and motion the Court & x27. Sign the Amended Judgment information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ). )..., defendant has made no additional showing as to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court the ORDER, the Court Defendants! Governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus form, the authority must be tabbed separated!: FDV-22-816509 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: EVANGELISTA...